Extract A- UK public
sector investment and borrowing (£billion)
|
Year
|
Investment
|
Borrowing
|
|
2003
|
15.06
|
34.89
|
|
2004
|
16.98
|
37.95
|
|
2005
|
23.95
|
42.59
|
|
2006
|
23.79
|
32.17
|
|
2007
|
25.98
|
36.36
|
|
2008
|
38.61
|
69.00
|
|
2009
|
52.98
|
156.21
|
|
2010
|
40.12
|
149.21
|
|
2011
|
28.96
|
121.04
|
[Source: official statistics, September 2012]
Extract B
Britain’s economy has suffered a period of unimpressive
growth since the depths of the recession in 2008 and 2009. In 2011, the growth
in real GDP was just 0.7% and official estimates for the second quarter of 2012
show a contraction in GDP of 0.5%, a third consecutive quarterly decline. The
Government blames external shocks, such as the ongoing crisis in the eurozone,
and the slowdown in growth in America and China for the weak recovery of the UK
economy. However, many believe that the UK Government’s austerity policy of
reducing the budget deficit, by reducing government spending and increasing
taxation, has meant that the recovery has been much weaker than necessary.
Many business leaders want to see more measures to stimulate growth. They tend to support the policy of cutting the budget deficit in order to reduce borrowing by the public sector, but they also argue for investment in infrastructure (such as building new roads and rail networks) to reduce costs, increase productive capacity, create jobs and improve Britain’s long-term competitiveness.
[Source: news reports, September 2012]
Extract C
The weak recovery of the UK economy has led to renewed
demands for a boost to investment in the infrastructure of the UK economy. The
Coalition government has responded by relaxing planning rules and by providing
construction companies with a guaranteed return on their investment to try to
encourage the private sector to finance large scale projects. The Government
says that it hopes to encourage infrastructure investment in, for example,
transport, energy supplies, housing, and faster broadband and mobile phone
networks. However, it is reluctant to finance such investment in the
infrastructure by increasing government spending. More government spending on
infrastructure projects could mean cuts elsewhere, tax increases or more
borrowing.
Investing in infrastructure can be expected to result in a multiplier process and is important for growth. It can increase real GDP by reducing unproductive journey times, improving labour mobility, providing better access to overseas markets, attracting foreign firms to set up in the UK and by increasing aggregate demand during the construction phase of the projects. However, any increase in spending might, in the short run, also lead to higher inflation and an increase in the balance of payments deficit.
[Source: news reports, September 2012]
5 mark: Define
the term ‘multiplier process’
8 mark: Using
Extract A, identify two significant points of comparison between public sector
investment and borrowing over the period shown.
12 mark: With the
help of an appropriate diagram, explain why low growth in the rest of the world
is likely to affect the recovery of the UK economy.
25 mark: Using
the data and your economic knowledge, assess the likely consequences of
increased spending on infrastructure for the performance of the UK economy.
No comments:
Post a Comment